JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 21, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Oscar Vergel Canal En Representacion De Ecopetrol·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia dentro del término de ejecutoria de oficio o a petición de parte
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Aclaración Sentencia.

Se solicita aclarar la sentencia T-529/1l, argumentando que en ella no se hace mención de los parámetros o lineamientos que se deben tener en cuenta por ECOPETROL, a efectos de dar cumplimiento a lo dispuesto como medida de protección dada la estabilidad laboral reforzada de la que es objeto el accionante.

La Sala encuentra que lo pretendido por el memorialista rebasa el propósito de la figura de la aclaración y en tal sentido DENIEGA la petición impetrada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-529 de 2011, proferida por la Sala Segunda de Revision.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al interesado que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
Partial dissentMauricio González CuervoPartial dissentGabriel Eduardo Mendoza MarteloPartial dissentAdriana María Guillén Arango
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.